Demand for dairy is driving the badger cull – yet no one is talking about it


Thursday, 6 October, 2016

Elena Orde reports on why badgers are ‘stripy scapegoats’ for the government and the dairy industry

Today may be National Badger Day, but badgers have been far from celebrated recently. In an attempt to reduce bovine TB in dairy cows, the government recently expanded its controversial badger cull to include several new areas. However, experts say that badgers are just acting as stripy scapegoats – although they may use more technical language. Evidence shows that the cull is ineffective, expensive and inhumane – so why do we continue with it? The answer: to appease and protect the interests of dairy farmers. 

Reports have showed that of the small percentage of badgers that have TB, a smaller percentage still are able to transmit it to cattle. Because the culling isn’t selective, this means that thousands of badgers which pose no threat to cows have been killed. This is often through painful and drawn-out methods, such as free-shooting, which often severely wounds rather than kills outright. This all occurs at great cost to the taxpayer – the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs stated that last year over £1.5M was spent on killing less than 1,500 badgers, a cost of over £1000 per badger.

However, no one is talking about the link between the badger cull and the dairy industry. The cull has been driven by dairy producers pressuring the government, funded by consumer demand for their products. Public demand for dairy means that cows are protected by farmers and the government at the expense of other British wildlife, including badgers.

This comes after the news that intensive farming has an ‘overwhelmingly negative’ impact on nature, with more than half of UK species in decline. This is just one more example of how our modern farming practices have a negative effect on the world around us – from public health to the environment to the animals involved, and now to surrounding wildlife.

The public have generally been against the badger cull since it was launched in 2012. Protesters have been patrolling badger cull areas, releasing badgers from traps (which is entirely legal) and starting petitions. This government petition against the badger cull has reached almost 50,000 signatures. This warranted an official response, in which the government avoided the questions raised, and declared that it planned to continue with the method of killing badgers. 

In its response the government painted a rosy picture of agricultural life, and stated that bovine TB is the greatest animal health threat in the UK. It left out the fact that the dairy cows at risk of bovine TB are destined to be killed at around a quarter of their natural life span, after a lifetime of being exploited for their milk. Male calves are routinely killed shortly after birth as they are deemed useless by the dairy industry. Surely our farming industry is a bigger threat to animal health, as it profits from killing animals? This fact highlights our doublethink about animals. 

The badger cull has clearly been a political tool to keep farmers and farming communities onside. The government have been keen to show that they are doing something to help, that they are taking a strong stance. In reality this is manifesting in violence and cruelty rather than addressing the root cause – modern farming methods.

The only logical response is to stop supporting the dairy industry, which profits from animal suffering and is devastating our wildlife. Sign up our 30 Day Vegan Pledge for free recipes, tips and advice on going vegan.

By Elena Orde

The dairy industry is heavily subsidised -to call on the government to shift subsidies towards plant agriculture instead.

Chocolate Strawberry Oatmeal

Vegan Gingerbread Tea Latté